Well... how do you create kinetic damage with something that is basicaly an oversized flashlight? Throw it at someone?

Then they would just be pigeonholed into EM/KIN instead of EM/THERM.
Seems pretty pointless.

Howabout give Amarr ships more launcher hardpoints instead? Even if they don't missile spec, it makes sense to assume they would be well aware of their damage type weakness, and would make some sort of arrangements for it. I don't understand why they hate missile launchers almost as much as Gallente do.

But they need a weakness, otherwise they where way to powerfull.

OP are you suggesting to change all the resists on minmatar t2 ships too?

Ah, finally I understand the point.

You want to keep the EM/THERM on the rest of the ammo, with the option for KIN on T2 Crystals, and thus reduce one of the drawbacks of lasers as a weapon system.

Please don't change Amarr cruisers to missiles. Medium lasers are a very good weapon system, pretty much all missiles except for Cruise are terrible.

Amarr don't need more capacitor for lasers, Minmatar need less cargo space for ammo and cap booster charges. Also, artillery should take multiple units of ammo with each volley so that it burns through it fast despite the slow fire rate. That would put Winmatar ammo problems on par with other race's ammo problems.

amarr are now the missile/drone/neut and sometimes laser race, and every ship they change to something other than lasers the community loves to death, so obviously lasers are unwanted and have no placce in EVE and deserve the same treatment as Incarna.

If you changed the damage type son t2 lasers as per the OP the. This would open up and argument that hybrid t2 ammo should deliver explosive/em.

Essentially observing an enemy's guns would give you no clue as to what their damage output is likely to be, which removes a strategic element of combat that many miss but many others take advantage of.